Ethics Paper -- essays research papers

allday we each face headers of what we ought to do. We sometimes ask ourselves,What if everyone did that? Every time you decide to pick up a humanity of looking glass because you wantthe city to look nice, you argon not doing it because of the aesthetic violence of one piece of put away, butrather what the city would look give care if no one picked up their trash.Kant uses this everyday question in his formation of godliness as part of the categoricalimperative. For Kant, the morality of an action shadow be determined by the categorical imperative.Kant would like to determine the morality of stealing, in that respectfore Kant wants to examine themorality of I pass on steal anything I want to satisfy my desire for it. Then Kant rephrases the avowal to ask the question of what if everybody did it, Everyone will steal anything they wantto satisfy their desire for it. Then Kant makes that statement a maxim, a law which must befollowed by everyone in Kants screen out world. Kant examines the world and asks if you fuckconsistently will your maxim in a world in which that is a law? and if everyone steals anythingthey desire, how will there be topographic point rights since it is okay for anyone to take anything at anytime? There cant. Since there are no property rights, the maxim breaks down since stealing onlyoccurs when someone takes property from its rightful owner. Since there is a contradiction in the1 founding of the maxim, you are prohibited from acting on that maxim.Imagine frost Man, a cold, sensible person that does not find inner satisfaction in spreadingjoy and cannot take delight in the satisfaction of opposites. Does Ice Man have a duty to serve up otherswhen they are in hire? Ice Man is wealthy and not in need of help from others? Ice Man wants todetermine the morality of I will not help others when they are in need of help. Therefore, whatif everyone did not help others when they are in need of help. Despite this being an unhappy world, there is no contradiction in conception in this maxim irrelevant above. But does it pass Kantscontradiction in willing test? Ice Man is defined as a rational being. As a rational being, Ice Manknows that one day he too will be in need. Since he is a rational being, he will prefer thatsomeone would help him and as a rational being, cannot will that no one would help other whenthey are in need. Since it fails the contradiction in willing test, ev... ...by universalizingthe situation and removing your own self interest, then we judge the consequences to our actionswithout prejudice or preference. By ignoring the question of What if everyone did that?, we can3justify murder, lies, and other unmoral acts that can hurt much more than than we realize in the heat ofthe moment. If I leave a piece of trash on the run aground when I am in quite a little or otherwise pressuredand believe that is okay, that piece of trash on the ground means that someone else will have topick it up and that other people will feel more free to drop their trash there.1 Many actions mayseem to hurt no one, but in the aggregate do cause pain to others. By ignoring the question ofWhat if everyone did that?, we force out the infinitesimal effects our actions have on everyone wecome into contact with it or simply feel the secondary effects. Therefore, the universal question ofWhat if everyone did that? should be a part of our ethical thinking.1I did an informal study on this in my mixer room last year with both dirty dishes in the make pass and paper towels onthe floor. The difference in dirtiness after an hr was impressive. Real studies have been done on this as well.