The Function of the Chorus in Henry V Essay -- Papers Shakespeare Essa

The Function of the emit in henry V O for a m spend of fire, The refrain introduces the start of Henry V with tomography of flames and war. Shakespeargon uses the Chorus to initiate the play and summarise each stand for to the audition before the next one begins. He is merely a tool to avoid the audience getting too confused. The function for the chorus line is merely a practical one, by summarising the plot at each available opportunity there is little chance for confusion, even if the audience do mystify to use their imagination. But, we must ask ourselves, if this was Shakespeares only case for including the Chorus, why does he not use a similar wind in his other plays? Surely in all of his plays the audience have to imagine the setting (the stage of the globe was set in the round, and so had no room for large props and scenery), and many of his plays have much than complex plots than this one, so why do we need the Chorus? The reaction is the Chorus puts across a very(prenominal) clear view of warfare and Henrys kingship. It is a very romantic, capricelised view, which uses over-zealous language, such as two aright monarchies to create a strong glorified impact on the audience. They are building up the audiences expectations of this to be a mighty, glorious play. The use of the imagery of flames and fire repeats itself throughout the Choruss scenes. O for a muse of fire is the very first line, which immediately conjures up a grand image. Flames represent war, save are also a typical representation of courage and bravery. When the Chorus says, the youth of England are on fire, it imposes upon the audience the idea of keen foretelling and excit... ...nch of salt and are not really to be trusted. Certain productions of Henry V do glorify war, for example Laurence Oliviers production in the 1940s pied a beautiful, majestic picture of war, However after analysing the role of the Choru s in the play, I do not believe this play is a glorification of warfare. Henrys leadership is romanticised in the play considerably more than the idea of warfare. Productions such as Kenneth Brannaghs creation paint a far more realistic view of war, as a bloody, filthy affair. This is more what I feel the subtext of the play is. War is not really idealised in this play, it can be taken as being glorified, but because of Shakespeares use of the structure of the play, and the Choruss propaganda fabrications, the character of the Chorus does not in any path add to this glorification.