Unit 4 Discussion Board Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Unit 4 Discussion Board - Essay ExampleCreating the f all apart of association with the followers in all likelihood derive all other associated activities with leadinghip. In this regard, it therefore not head whether we need a new generation of leadership as well as new gender. As long as leadership can and should associate itself with the followers, there arises hardly a need to indicate for a shift in the ways leadership is pursued and practiced. Though it has been argued that leadership has been viewed and studied with applaud to the masculinity (-Metcalfe, 2002) however this is not the fact in its entirety. It must be noted that almost all the leadership whether in the corporate world or in political world was masculine and it was probably because of this reason that the leadership has mostly being studied within that context.In raise to be an good leader, there are various personal traits and qualities which a leader must have in order to be effective. These include fro m motivating the employees to making decisions of strategic nature. However, these traits are not gender specific in nature however there are certain attributes specific to both male and female leaders which both make them effective in their fields and leadership is largely gender neutral. (Gedney, 1999). However historically the evolution of leadership theories started with the focus on the masculine characteristics of the leaders. The so called Great Man theories of 1930s and mid-forties greatly emphasized on the personal characteristics of the leaders including their intelligence, personal charisma etc. The great objet dart theories largely emphasized on the role of males into the leadership however that was an era where there were very a few(prenominal) opportunities left for the women to participate into the mainstream economy. Lack of opportunity was therefore the main reason behind the development of hypothetical framework which were largely focusing on the masculine chara cteristics o f the leaders. This has historical connotations also because the