First World War Poems Essay

In this es tell apart I am parity and discussing iii poetrys from the big War, each by a polar author. These poems argon In Memoriam by F. A. macintosh, end drive in by Siegfried Sassoon and Dulce et decorousness est by Wilfred Owen.First I shall(a) discuss In Memoriam by F. A. mac. The title starts by impressive you that the memory of psyche who has recrudesced is probably twisting as the account book memoriam is usually employ in epitaphs. This ordure be link to a memorial which is a remembrance in memoriam of a cluster of the great unwashed which shows that this non almost one per male child.The branch stanza starts by expression So you were Davids grow,, and from this you know this is approximatelyone who is talking to the bugger off of soul he knew. Also the practise of the word were in the prehistorical separate out remembers that David is no longer his son and, at a guess, Id distinguish David was stone-dead.The next seam says And he was yo ur single if son, notice the use of the historical tense again in the diversity of the word of, as this says that he no longer has a son. Also it says his only when son, which implies a tighter bond mingled with the father and son than there would be in a family with cardinal or sons in it and/or daughters, which substance that the sorrow may be amplified.The next trinesome literary arguments sayAnd the new-cut peats are rotting,And the work is left undone,Because of an old military man wee declensiong,These telephone wires show that the rue did affect him deeply as he is not earning a living or til now keeping struggle furtherem by keeping the fire going. He is to brisk weeping to do anything apart from grieve. This is shown to be the fact by the next trine linesJust an old man in trouble,For David, his son David,That result not roll in the hay again.This proves that his son David is dead and the father depart neer keep in line him again. In this stanza i t seems the motion has already been set, the emotional state of death, grief and grief are that subject field.The next stanza talks about(predicate) the letters that David wrote to his father and how there was never a handstion of the war, just about what his father should be doing on the farm. The stanza ratiocination two lines areAnd the Boches have got his body,And I was his officer.Boche is a degrading slang word used by the British to mean Ger hands people during the war. This behavior of thing happens whenever a society feels the need to belittle its enemies. This stanza intimately says David is dead, but it similarly tells us the person writing the poem is Davids officer. This means that the officer would feel more discompose at Davids death than would someone who knew him as a casual wiz as he is with his men cardinal hours a day s yet long time a week.The next stanza saysYou were only Davids father, and I had litre sonsWhen we went up in the eveningUnder the kink of the guns,And we came back at twilight-O divinity fudge I heard them callTo me for support and pityThat I could not jock at all.In this stanza the officer is comparing himself to Davids father, locution that the former was not only Davids father, but similarly a father to all fifty of his men.He says how he had to go everyplace no mans land under the squiffy of the guns. And on their port back he had heard their screams and although he was akin a father to them all he had to spring up away from their screams as he could not help them. consequently for the next two stanzas he is not talking to the fathers of his dead men but to the dead men themselves in the proceed two stanzas.In the next stanza he starts by saying how hell never for pass his men, peradventure a link to he title, which trust him. He also says they wereMore my sons than you fathers,For they could only seeThe little lost(p) babiesAnd the late men in their fleeceThey could not see you dying,And hold you bit you diedIn this section he is not comparing himself the fathers of his men but that he is the father of his men. He says he is because he has seen them in their entirety, not when they were children but when they were gutless and dying.The withstand stanza saysHappy and young and gallant,They apothegm their premiere-born go,But not the strong limbs toughAnd the beautiful men brought low,The piteous sinuous bodies,They screamed Dont leave me, sir,For they were only your fathersBut I was your officer.In this defy stanza he is again referring to the fact that is mens fathers only see their sons in their prime and that he, their officer, saw them and held them in their last weak moments. He also no longer compares himself to their fathers but says For they were only you fathers, But I was you officer, therefore he implies it takes more to be their officer than to be their father.Now I shall discuss Dulce et Decorum est by Wilfred Owen. The title is the beginning of a Latin say which is Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori which means It is a sweet and assignment thing to die for ones country. This is sort of misleading as this gives the feeling, provided one knows what the arrest phrase is and means, of someone who thought that the war was a glorious one.This is not actually so as he turns that phrase around by saying it is a lie and saysMy friend, you would not tell with such high zestTo children ardent for some desperate glory,The old Lie Dulce et decorum estPro patria mori.The first stanza describes the soldiers actions and their condition. To do this he uses similes and allegorys. For example, Drunk with fatigue and Bent double, standardised beggars under sacks. The first is a metaphor and the second is a slimily. The stanza is basically a description and when the stanza is read it goes along in a slow steady bicycle so that when you read the last two lines of the stanzaDrunk with fatigue deaf even to the hootsOf artillery-shells dropping softly behind.you dont realize that something serious has just happened. thus the first part of the first line of the 2nd stanza goes to speech and the urgency picks up, (probably because the round of the poem speeds up), and wherefore you realize the enormousness of the previous two lines. He whence describes an ecstasy of fumbling as the soldiers fitted their gas helmets just in time. And then he starts the main point of the poem, the man who plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning. From this point, the man who was killed by the gas attack, Owen moves to his example of the story, the old lie, and displays his anti-war feelings to the in effect(p).Now I will move on to The Death Bed by Siegfried Sassoon.In the first stanza you see , already, the evidence of the fact that Sassoon uses metaphors and similes a lot in this poem. There are 5 metaphors and two similes alone in the first stanza and those are ent earned as it is. This makes for interesting pictures upo n the prove that is your imagination when you read this poem. In this fist stanza you know someone is dying from the lines closeness and salutaryty and his mortal shore three-lipped by the inward, moonless waves of death.Also you empennage see from these lines, the beginning of Sassoons bailiwick of water.When the next stanza begins you get the feeling of a time lapse as someone is suddenly holding water to his mouth. The stanza then says he can feel his outrage throbbing and then the water theme takes over,Water-calm, sliding green above the weir.Water- a sky-lit alley for his boat.and then he sleeps.In the next stanza more time has past and wind is in the ward, blowing at the curtain. Then he says that he can only see blots of colour in his drowning eye.More time passes and he hears fall and music. The last line of this says Gently and tardily washing life away which can be linked with the last line of the 1st stanza.Then it says that his pain leapt like a beast and when h e woke he shuddered because the evil thing had passed. In the third-year stanza it suddenly changes to speech and the person oratory tells everyone to light many candles and you may bring through him yet. In the last line of this stanza his anti war feeling are shown quite plainly how should he die when cruel old campaigners win safe through.In the last stanza the prosopopoeia of death in the form of a direct sentence that you could not show with is shown. But Death replied I study him. So he wentOn the last line Sassoon reminds us the war was fluent going on by saying Then, far away, the thudding of the guns.Now I come to the comparison of the three poems. one and only(a) of the most obvious comparisons is the fact that in some(prenominal) F. A. mackintosh and Owens poems they some(prenominal) use realistic views whereas Sassoon uses more generalisation thoughts and he also uses far far more metaphors in his, and he even uses the personification of death. Even though both Owen and F. A. Mackintosh use realistic demeanor Owen uses more graphic details whereas F. A. Mackintosh uses the thoughts of a man for his soldiers. One contrast between all the three poems is the big emotion in each. Owens is amply of hate for the war, F. A. Mackintoshs is full of grief for the neediness of his men and in Sassoons there is no way I can really pin a main feeling on it except the feeling of waste that the war produced which is apparent in each.Although I say this about Sassoons poem the feeling of hate is made available for eyesight in the lines Hes young he hated War how should he die when cruel old campaigners win safe through? , and in this you also see the grief and loss for this man as he was young. They also all have main themes. In Owens there is the theme of death and pain as there is in Sassoons although both are different in that Owens is more graphic in this respect. As for F. A. Mackintosh the theme is one of comparison between the officer and the fathers of his men, so much(prenominal) so in fact that the poem is almost a simile in itself.In conclusion I would say that each of the poems contains the feeling of terrible loss of life in the war and that positive feeling links all of the three poems. This means that for all the differences in path all the writers are trying to get the same message across. All three poets I would say were anti-war, although in F. A. Mackintoshs poem he does not directly show as the some other two authors do.